PER CURIAM:
We have carefully considered appellant's contentions that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for attempted escape, 18 U.S.C.A. § 751(a), that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, and that the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony and in denying a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We find all these contentions to be without merit.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
