1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 265 Md.
  5. 265 Md. 647 (1972)
 

RICH v. CITY OF BALTIMORE

[No. 345, September Term, 1971.]

265 Md. 647 (1972)

290 A.2d 777

RICH ET UX. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 19, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh J. Monaghan, II, with whom were Monaghan & Main on the brief, for appellants.

Clayton A. Dietrich, Chief Assistant Solicitor, and A. Douglas Owens, Special Assistant Solicitor, with whom was George L. Russell, Jr., City Solicitor, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellants, Edward L. Rich, Jr., et ux., complain because a Baltimore City judge sustained a demurrer to their declaration, without leave to amend, on the ground that they had failed to give the written notice required by what is now Code (1972 Repl. Vol.) Art. 57, § 18. His ruling was correct.

The incident in question occurred on June 14, 1968. The declaration was filed June 10, 1971, claiming that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases