1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 62 N.J.
  5. 62 N.J. 19 (1972)
 

LENA v. ENSLEY

62 N.J. 19 (1972)

297 A.2d 841

CARMELA LENA, ADMINISTRATIX OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA AND ADMINISTRATIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLARENCE ENSLEY, ANTHONY DiPIETRO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GIORDANO AND MOLAR TRUCKING CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 18, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald S. Gordon argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pincus, Sheehan & Hendricks, attorneys).

Mr. Henry H. Rubenson argued the cause for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes to us as of right because of dissent in the Appellate Division. The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for reasons expressed in the majority opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 7.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases