1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 5 Pa.Commw.
  5. 5 Pa.Commw. 73 (1972)
 

PHILADELPHIA v. ROHM & HAAS CO., INC.

Appeal, No. 818 C.D. 1971.

5 Pa.Commw. 73 (1972)

Philadelphia v. Rohm & Haas Company, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

March 13, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Jay Sklar, Assistant City Solicitor, with him John Mattioni, Deputy City Solicitor, and Levy Anderson, City Solicitor, for appellant.

Louis C. Johanson, with him Henry Thomas Dolan and Fein, Criden, Johanson, Dolan & Morrissey, for appellee.

Argued February 9, 1972, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT.

OPINION BY JUDGE KRAMER, March 13, 1972:

This is an appeal from an Order of the Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia County discharging a rule to show cause why the appeal taken by Rohm & Haas Company, Inc. (appellee) should not be dismissed.

This action was commenced on June 7, 1971, by the filing of a "Code Enforcement Complaint" filed by the City of Philadelphia against the appellee charging it with ". . . odor emissions in violation of Section 3-201...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases