NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY v. LUNDQUIST

Nos. 43047, 43054.

198 N.W.2d 543 (1972)

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Third-Party Plaintiff, Respondent-Appellant, v. Robert A. LUNDQUIST, et al., Defendants, Lyle R. Barker and Orel A. Barker, Defendants and Third-Party Defendants, Appellants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 2, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dougherty & Scott, Fairmont, for respondent-appellant.

Erickson, Zierke, Kuderer, Utermarck & Sinor, Fairmont, O. C. Adamson II, Minneapolis, for appellants-respondents.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and ROGOSHESKE, TODD, and MASON, JJ.


TODD, Justice.

These appeals arise out of two actions brought by a surety to recover from indemnitors the amounts it was required to pay under two contractors' bonds following default by its principal. In one action (No. 43054), the surety, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, sought to recover from Robert A. Lundquist, Ruth Lundquist, Lyle R. Barker, and Orel A. Barker amounts it paid to complete the construction of a school...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases