PETTIT v. AUSTIN LOGGING COMPANY


497 P.2d 207 (1972)

In the matter of the Compensation of Wesley D. PETTIT, Claimant. Wesley D. Pettit, Respondent, v. AUSTIN LOGGING COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided May 18, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip A. Mongrain, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

William E. Taylor, Gold Beach, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was William A. Babcock, Springfield.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and THORNTON, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

This is an appeal by the employer from an adverse order of the circuit court adopting the findings of the hearing officer and the Workmen's Compensation Board (with one exception), affirming the orders of the hearing officer and Board in favor of claimant, and awarding $1,000 attorney fees for the appeal to the circuit court.

Claimant was employed by Austin Logging Company as a cat skinner. In the latter part of June 1967 while yarding logs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases