STATE v. MURPHREE

No. 1 CA-CR 386.

18 Ariz. App. 51 (1972)

500 P.2d 311

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Walton Carl MURPHREE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

August 24, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay H. Bundy, Kingman, for appellant.

Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., by Mary Z. Chandler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.


JACOBSON, Judge.

The only error raised by defendant in support of his argument that his conviction by a jury on two felony counts of drawing checks on insufficient funds or credit should be reversed is that the prosecutor in his closing argument to the jury made allegedly prejudicial remarks. However, the defendant made no objection in the trial court as to the comments of which he now complains.

It is the well-settled rule that it is the duty of counsel and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases