1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 119 N.J.
  5. 119 N.J. Super. 572 (1972)
 

MEADOWLAND REG., & C, v. HACKENSACK, & C.

119 N.J. Super. 572 (1972)

293 A.2d 192

MEADOWLAND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et als., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, et als., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 26, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred A. Porro, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Porro, Flynn & Murray, attorneys).

Mr. David S. Litwin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEONARD and CARTON.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of certain temporary zoning regulations adopted by the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission which placed a "freeze" on the use of 10,000 acres of land in the Hackensack Meadowlands.

The Meadowlands Commission was created by the New Jersey Legislature in 1968 for the purpose of overseeing the orderly development of the Meadowlands (N.J.S.A. 13:17-1 et seq.). The Commission was empowered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases