1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 338 F.Supp.
  5. 338 F.Supp. 319 (1972)
 

ESTES v. SPENCE

Civ. A. No. 1288-70.

338 F.Supp. 319 (1972)

Harry A. ESTES, Plaintiff, v. Adolphus N. SPENCE, II, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 14, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Peer, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff; Bredhoff, Barr, Gottesman, Cohen & Peer, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Robert M. Werdig, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., U. S. Dist. Court, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

PARKER, District Judge.

1. This is a suit by a losing candidate for promotion in the Government Printing Office (GPO) to set aside the promotion of the successful candidate, alleging that it was in violation of GPO and Civil Service Commission (CSC) regulations, the Administrative Procedure Act, and due process of law.

2. The plaintiff Harry A. Estes was at all relevant times...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases