INVESTMENT PROPERTIES OF ASHEVILLE, INC. v. ALLEN

No. 94.

188 S.E.2d 441 (1972)

281 N.C. 174

INVESTMENT PROPERTIES OF ASHEVILLE, INC., and Baxter H. Taylor v. Martha Norburn Mead ALLEN.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Rehearing Granted June 28, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Morris & Golding by James F. Blue, III, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

Bennett, Kelly & Long, by Harold K. Bennett, Asheville, for plaintiffs-appellees.


MOORE, Justice.

Defendant Allen first contends the trial court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence.

On a motion for a directed verdict by the defendant, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a), Rules of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases