1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 264 Md.
  5. 264 Md. 326 (1972)
 

HARNISH v. HERALD-MAIL CO.

[No. 81, September Term, 1971.]

264 Md. 326 (1972)

286 A.2d 146

HARNISH ET UX. v. HERALD-MAIL CO., INC. ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for modification and reargument filed February 22, 1972.

Denied March 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin N. Scharf for appellants.

John H. Urner and David W. Byron, with whom were Byron, Moylan & Urner on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

HAMMOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court. BARNES and FINAN, JJ., dissent and BARNES, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which FINAN, J., concurs at page 338 infra.

Richard Harnish, a chiropractor and owner of rental properties, and his wife, Doris Jane, sued the Herald-Mail Co., Inc., which owns and publishes two newspapers in Hagerstown, The Daily Mail (an evening edition), and The Morning Herald, and Philip Ebersole, a reporter, on an amended declaration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases