RUDDY v. ATL. MUT. INS. CO.


73 Misc.2d 494 (1972)

George M. Ruddy, Jr., Appellant, v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

July 11, 1972


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max J. Gwertzman and Milton B. Pfeffer for appellant. Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens (James M. Estabrook and Francis M. Meyler of counsel), for respondent.

GOLD, J. P., and LUPIANO, J., concur in Per Curiam opinion; QUINN, J., concurs in memorandum.


Per Curiam.

The terminology employed by defendant insurance company in this "yacht policy" is significant.

A distinction in the premium was made between the "Navigating Period" and the "Lay-Up Period", the former being at a rate about three times more than the latter. The assured warranted that, if "Navigating", the insured vessel shall be confined to certain waterways of the United States. The assured further warranted that the vessel would be "laid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases