1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 60 N.J.
  5. 60 N.J. 439 (1972)
 

PAPP v. RUTHERFORD WINDOW CLEANING CO.

60 N.J. 439 (1972)

291 A.2d 1

WILLIAM PAPP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. RUTHERFORD WINDOW CLEANING CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. WILLIAM PAPP, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. I.T. & T. FEDERAL LABORATORIES, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 25, 1972.

Decided May 22, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas J. Osborne, Jr., argued the cause for respondent-appellant Rutherford Window Cleaning Co. (Messrs. Vaccaro and Osborne, attorneys).

Mr. Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent-cross appellant I.T. & T. Federal Laboratories (Messrs. Schreiber, Conway, Reiseman & Michals, attorneys).

Mr. Herman M. Wilson argued the cause for petitioner-respondent William Papp (Messrs. Goldstein & Ballin, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This workmen's compensation claim arises out of a heart attack allegedly induced by efforts arising out of and in the course of petitioner's employment with both respondents. Petitioner worked for different portions of each day for each respondent. The Workmen's Compensation Division dismissed the claim against I.T. & T. Federal Laboratories, and assessed the permanent disability resulting from the heart attack against respondent Rutherford Window...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases