1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 60 N.J.
  5. 60 N.J. 385 (1972)
 

SADOFSKI v. WILLIAMS

60 N.J. 385 (1972)

290 A.2d 143

JULIA SADOFSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF KATHERINE BARON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JANET B. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ELIZABETH C. NOEBELS, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 24, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin E. Kravarik argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Selesky, Kolsky, Kravarik & Epstein, attorneys; Mr. Kravarik, on the brief).

Mr. Richard F. Lert argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Lert and Mr. Vincent P. Maltese, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HALL, J.

This litigation arises out of an unfortunate quarrel among the children of the decedent Katherine Baron over the amounts of two savings accounts and two certificates of deposit. These amounts, all belonging originally to Mrs. Baron, stood just prior to her death, intestate, in her name and that of appellant Janet B. Williams, her oldest child, as "joint tenants with right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases