Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court November 8, 1972.
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the denial of his motion for continuance was error. It is well settled that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance rests in the discretion of the presiding judge and his decision will not be disturbed on appeal unless the defendant shows abuse of discretion or shows that he did not get a fair trial. State v. Blackmon,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.