1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 119 N.J.
  5. 119 N.J. Super. 235 (1972)
 

DANIEL ET AL. v. BOR. OF OAKLAND

119 N.J. Super. 235 (1972)

290 A.2d 764

HERBERT H. DANIEL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided May 10, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Losche & Losche, attorneys for plaintiffs.

Mr. William DeLorenzo, Jr., attorney for defendant.

TOSCANO, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiffs, residents of the Borough of Oakland, filed a complaint in lieu of prerogative writs as consumers of water from the borough and as representatives of all the consumers of water in the borough, challenging the validity of an ordinance dated September 10, 1970 which increased the water charges retroactively to cover a period from July 1 to September 10, 1970. They allege that the ordinance is illegal, violates the constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases