1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 120 N.J.
  5. 120 N.J. Super. 194 (1972)
 

BIALKOWSKI v. BOR. OF RIDGEFIELD

120 N.J. Super. 194 (1972)

293 A.2d 671

GENE M. BIALKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND GEORGE CALZA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Sylvia B. Pressler argued the cause for the appellant (Okin, Pressler & Shapiro, attorneys).

Mr. Michael L. Scherby argued the cause for the respondents.

Before Judges LABRECQUE, KOLOVSKY and ALLCORN.

PER CURIAM.

Under the provisions of N.J.S.A. 40:87-15, the borough council was authorized to appoint, in addition to various designated administrative officials, "such other officers as the council may deem necessary." The same section provided that all such officers "shall hold office for 1 year and until their successors shall have qualified." A 1970 amendment simply added to the list of specifically designated offices, the office of "borough building inspector...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases