1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 112 N.H.
  5. 112 N.H. 94 (1972)
 

HORSESHOE FISH & GAME CLUB v. MERRIMACK VILLAGE DIST.

No. 6222.

112 N.H. 94 (1972)

HORSESHOE FISH & GAME CLUB v. MERRIMACK VILLAGE DISTRICT &a. MERRIMACK VILLAGE DISTRICT v. HORSESHOE FISH & GAME CLUB &a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

March 31, 1972

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig & Wenners (Mr. Vincent A. Wenners, Jr. orally) for Horseshoe Fish & Game Club.

Stein & Gormley for James Bigwood, Kenneth E. Marston, and Michael Petruizzullo, filed no brief.

Harkaway, Gall & Shapiro (Mr. Aaron A. Harkaway orally) for the Merrimack Village District, Seth J. Huidak, Henry W. Therriault, and specially for Ronald E. Geiger.

Craig & Wenners for the motion.

Harkaway, Gall & Shapiro opposed.

GRIMES, J.

The main question in this case is whether a lease of land owned by the Horseshoe Fish & Game Club to the Merrimack Village District is invalid due to lack of authority of those executing the lease. The action by the club seeks to have the purported lease declared null and void. The action by the district is to have the club restrained from removing gravel and topsoil. There are individual parties in each action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases