1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 121 N.J.
  5. 121 N.J. Super. 68 (1972)
 

BOR. OF EATONTOWN v. DANSKIN

121 N.J. Super. 68 (1972)

296 A.2d 81

THE BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BENJAMIN H. DANSKIN, COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided October 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry J. Saling argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Saling, Moore, O'Mara & Coogan, Attorneys).

Mr. William E. Russell argued the cause for defendant (Messrs. Pillsbury, Barnacle, Russell & Carton, Attorneys).

LANE, J.S.C.

This matter is before the court on the return of an order to show cause why defendant, County Clerk of Monmouth County, should not be required to place on the ballot for the general election to be held November 7, 1972 the question: "Shall the Eatontown Zoning Ordinance be changed to allow a second major regional shopping center in the Borough of Eatontown, N.J."

On April 26, 1972 a complete revision of the Eatontown zoning ordinance was introduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases