1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 338 F.Supp.
  5. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (1972)
 

UNITED STATES v. MUNCHAK

No. 69 Cr. 90.

338 F.Supp. 1283 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Andrew MUNCHAK, Jr., Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

February 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, for the United States; Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for defendant; Edward N. Costikyan, Jack C. Auspitz, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

This second motion for a new trial, based upon alleged perjury by a government witness and alleged newly discovered evidence, is made after the Court of Appeals affirmed the defendant's judgment of conviction,1 as well as the denial of the prior motion for a new trial, based also upon alleged perjury of other witnesses, employees of the defendant.

Defendant was found guilty on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases