1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 337 F.Supp.
  5. 337 F.Supp. 1068 (1972)
 

UNITED STATES v. CINCINNATI TRANSIT, INC.

No. 8250.

337 F.Supp. 1068 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CINCINNATI TRANSIT, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

January 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. McCorriston, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Philip S. Olinger, Asst. City Sol., Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Benjamin Gettler, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

PORTER, District Judge.

This is a case of first impression under the recently enacted Wage and Price Stabilization Act. It has mushroomed as a result of violent disagreement as to whether a service cutback and fare increase violated Phase I and II Price Freeze Regulations.

We conclude that the fare increase violated Phase II regulations. We conclude that the service cutback...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases