1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 356 F.Supp.
  5. 356 F.Supp. 1048 (1972)
 

RUNDLE v. MADIGAN

Nos. C-70-334, C-70-333.

356 F.Supp. 1048 (1972)

William Donovan RUNDLE, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Frank I. MADIGAN et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

November 20, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richards, Watson & Hemmerling, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Richard J. Moore, County Counsel, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Professional Corp., Oakland, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

PECKHAM, District Judge.

Defendants have moved to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment on counts 1 and 5 of plaintiffs' amended complaint. These counts allege causes of action based on violations of plaintiffs' civil rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3). Plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment on count 1. In addition to their other contentions, defendants interpose the defense of sovereign immunity against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases