1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 29 Cal.App.3d
  5. 29 Cal.App.3d 90 (1972)
 

CITY OF INDUSTRY v. GORDON

Docket No. 39895.

29 Cal.App.3d 90 (1972)

105 Cal. Rptr. 206

CITY OF INDUSTRY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARNOLD J. GORDON et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

November 30, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Thomas G. Baggot for Defendants and Appellants.

Graham Ritchie, City Attorney, Richards, Watson & Dreyfuss and Arnold Simon for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

DUNN, J.

This appeal by some defendants in an eminent domain action is from a superior court order which (1) denied such defendants' "Motion for Entry of Judgment of Dismissal" and (2) denied defendants' motion for "Attorneys Fees Upon Abandonment."

The record on this appeal consists of a clerk's transcript. It discloses that appealing defendants were 2 of 88 individually named defendants in an action in eminent domain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases