In the Matter of PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Debtor.
United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 7, 1972.
March 7, 1972.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Blank, Rome, Klaus & Comisky, by Edward Stern and James Howard, Philadelphia, for trustees, Penn Cent. Transp. Co.
Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman, by David Pittinsky, Philadelphia, Pa., and Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, by Edward A. Christensen, New York City, for Irving Trust Co.
Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, by Nochem S. Winnet, Philadelphia, Pa., for First Nat. City Bank of New York.
Tate & Ervin, by W. Bourne Ruthrauff, Philadelphia, Pa., for Richard Joyce Smith, trustee, New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R.
Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, by Richardson Blair, Morris Cheston, Jr., and Alan Fellheimer, Philadelphia, Pa., for Girard Trust Bank.
Davis, Polk & Wardwell, by Stephen M. Case, J. R. Leekley, and D. M. Galin, New York City, for Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, as Indenture Trustee.
Kelley, Drye, Warren, Clark, Carr & Ellis, by Peter G. Ernster, New York City, for Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, by Walter H. Brown, Jr., New York City, for Institutional Investors, Penn Central Group.
Edith I. Spivak, New York City, for City of New York.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, by John N. Schaeffer, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for Fidelity Bank.
Herbert Smolen, Asst. City Sol., for City of Philadelphia.
Roger J. Wittig, Asst. County Atty., for County of Erie, New York.
Moore, James, Wright & Gibbons, by Edwin S. Moore, III, Philadelphia, Pa., for Indianapolis, Ind., et al.
Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., by Joseph S. Van Bokkelem, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Indiana.
Vincent P. Molineaux, Albany, N. Y., and James P. Corcoran, New York City, for State of New York.
United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NO. 602
FULLAM, District Judge.
Order No. 78 governs sales of real and personal property involving less than $100,000, and the salvage and re-use of personal property of the Debtor. The Trustees and various other parties in interest now seek certain substantive and procedural revisions in that Order. Moreover, some questions have apparently arisen as to the adequacy of notice of the hearing which resulted in Order No. 78.
To...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
