1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 337 F.Supp.
  5. 337 F.Supp. 853 (1972)
 

BLUMCRAFT OF PITTSBURGH v. ARCHITECTURAL ART MFG., INC.

Civ. A. No. W-4037.

337 F.Supp. 853 (1972)

BLUMCRAFT OF PITTSBURGH, a Partnership consisting of Hyman Blum, et al., Plaintiff, v. ARCHITECTURAL ART MFG., INC. and Wenzel W. Thom, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

January 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. McConnon and Frank J. Benasutti of Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa., Hershberger, Patterson, Jones & Thompson, Wichita, Kan., for plaintiff.

William F. Pielsticker, Wichita, Kan., Warren N. Williams, of Schmidt, Johnson, Hovey, Williams & Chase, Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THEIS, District Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment, based originally on a claim of res judicata and estoppel as a result of a decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals holding plaintiff's patents invalid, and subsequent action of the United States Supreme Court denying certiorari. See Blumcraft of Pittsburgh v. Citizens...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases