ROTH v. HUDSON TRANSIT LINES


72 Misc.2d 999 (1972)

William Roth, Plaintiff, v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County.

December 13, 1972


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg (Robert M. Ginsberg of counsel), for plaintiff. Fogarty, Nielsen, McLaughlin & Semel (Edward M. Fogarty of counsel), for defendants.


BENTLEY KASSAL, J.

Plaintiff moved for a new trial after the jury verdict on the grounds that prejudicial error was committed by the court in giving "negative charges" to the jury. In essence, the instructions stated the jury was not to consider either damages for the aggravation of any previous back injuries or the plaintiff's susceptibility to back injury in its verdict.

This is a personal injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases