1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 58 N.J.
  5. 58 N.J. 40 (1971)
 

ALFRED VAIL MUT. ASSOC. v. BOR. OF NEW SHREWSBURY

58 N.J. 40 (1971)

274 A.2d 801

ALFRED VAIL MUTUAL ASSOCIATION AND THE TOWNSHIP OF SHREWSBURY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 8, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Milton A. Mausner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner & Carotenuto, attorneys).

Mr. William Himelman argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Klatsky, Himelman & Siegfried, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

We are here concerned with the validity of the current method of apportioning regional school costs between the constituent municipalities of the Tinton Falls Regional Elementary School District, the Township of Shrewsbury [hereinafter the Township] and the Borough of New Shrewsbury [hereinafter the Borough].

Due to the fact that the Borough of Eatontown School District and the Tinton Falls Regional Elementary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases