1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 260 Md.
  5. 260 Md. 692 (1971)
 

LaFORCE v. BUCKLIN

[No. 243, September Term, 1970.]

260 Md. 692 (1971)

273 A.2d 144

LaFORCE ET AL. v. BUCKLIN ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 5, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pierre J. LaForce, with whom was Alfred L. Scanlan on the brief, for appellants.

Joseph P. Blocher, with whom were Linowes & Blocher and R. Robert Linowes on the brief, for Mass-Goldsboro Joint Venture, part of appellees; and David L. Cahoon, County Attorney, and Robert G. Tobin, Jr., Assistant County Attorney, on the brief, for Erwin W. Bucklin, other appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We shall here be obliged to interpret a Montgomery County zoning ordinance relative to the permitted height of a building in a commercial zone. We shall affirm the order of the trial judge (Moore, J.) who wrote a very able and comprehensive opinion permitting the construction. We shall also be concerned with the application of Maryland Rule 882 c relative to the Court's discretion in the assessment of costs, since one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases