1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 260 Md.
  5. 260 Md. 689 (1971)
 

SHOREHAM DEVELOPERS v. STATLAND

[No. 284, September Term, 1970.]

260 Md. 689 (1971)

273 A.2d 152

SHOREHAM DEVELOPERS, INC. v. STATLAND, INDIVIDUALLY, ETC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 4, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Heeney, with whom were Heeney, McAuliffe & McAuliffe on the brief, for appellant.

Karl G. Feissner, with whom was Edward M. Statland on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY and DIGGES, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this dispute between attorney and client the trial judge, Bowie, J., thought their arrangement was neither as claimed by the client (Shoreham) nor as claimed by the attorney (Statland). He concluded it lay between the one and the other. Statland, although disappointed with Judge Bowie's resolution of the issue, seems content to let it stand. Shoreham, hewing to its original stance, invites us to strike down the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases