1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 400 U.S.
  5. 400 U.S. 548 (1971)
 

PICCIRILLO v. NEW YORK

No. 97.

400 U.S. 548 (1971)

91 S.Ct. 520

27 L.Ed.2d 596

PICCIRILLO v. NEW YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 25, 1971

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malvine Nathanson argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was William E. Hellerstein.

Stanley M. Meyer argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Eugene Gold.

PER CURIAM.

The occasion for granting the writ in this case was to resolve the important question whether it is necessary to accord "transactional" immunity, see Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), to compel a witness to give testimony before a state grand jury over his claim of the privilege against self-incrimination, or whether mere "use" immunity suffices to that end, see, e. g., Murphy v. Waterfront...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases