1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 330 F.Supp.
  5. 330 F.Supp. 609 (1971)
 

U-PROFIT, INC. v. BROMLEY LIMITED

Nos. 71-C-190, 71-C-191.

330 F.Supp. 609 (1971)

U-PROFIT, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, Plaintiff, v. BROMLEY LIMITED, Incorporated, et al., Defendants. TRUCK-O-MATIC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Monty FREEDMAN et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

August 11, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Johnson, by Eugene N. Johnson, Waukesha, Wis., for U-Profit and Truck-O-Matic.

Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bromley & Freedman.

John R. Hieber, Chicago, Ill., for Byerly.

Whyte, Hirschboeck, Minahan, Harding & Harland, by Reginald W. Nelson, Milwaukee, Wis., for Adams.

Brown & Harding, Lubbock, Tex., Brady, Tyrrell, Cotter & Cutler, Milwaukee, Wis., by Elwin J. Zarwell, Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel, for Skillern.

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The complaints in the above-entitled actions seek damages for the alleged interference with a contract between the plaintiff U-Profit, Inc., and the defendant Bromley Ltd., Inc., and for the purported infringement of a patent mark issued to the plaintiff Truck-O-Matic, Inc. Motions have been filed in both cases by four of the defendants. In addition, the plaintiffs have submitted motions which seek leave...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases