1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 441 Pa.
  5. 441 Pa. 406 (1971)
 

E. HEMPFIELD TWP. v. LANCASTER et al.

441 Pa. 406 (1971)

East Hempfield Township v. Lancaster et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 25, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D.A. Franklin, with him Bernard M. Zimmerman, City Solicitor, Charles Foltz Herr, C.W.B. Townsend, Jr., and Appel, Ranch, Herr & Appel, and Townsend, Elliott & Munson, for appellants.

John I. Hartman, Jr., with him Windolph, Burkholder & Hartman, for appellees.

Before BELL, C.J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS, January 25, 1971:

The sole issue presented here is whether the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County had jurisdiction to determine the reasonableness of certain water rates fixed by the City of Lancaster, for users outside the City, or whether exclusive jurisdiction for such a determination rested with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. We reverse the order of the Superior Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases