SHERIDAN v. LIQUOR SALESMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 2, ETC.

No. 999, Docket 71-1228.

444 F.2d 393 (1971)

John SHERIDAN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIQUOR SALESMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 2, D. R. W. AND A. W. I. U. A., AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. LIQUOR SALESMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 2, D. R. W. & A. W. I. U. A., AFL-CIO, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AUSTIN NICHOLS & CO., Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided June 18, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., New York City (Schulman, Abarbanel, Perkel & McEvoy and Bertram Perkel, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Joel Buchman, New York City (Buchman & Buchman and William J. Poltarak, New York City, on the brief), for third-party defendants-appellees.

Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Appellants, as members of Liquor Salesmen's Union Local No. 2 ("Union"), brought suit in June 1969 against it and its officers for breach of the duty of fair representation, Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S.Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). They appeal from an order of the district court staying proceedings in their action pending arbitration of the Union's third-party claims against certain of plaintiffs' employers and directing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases