1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 333 F.Supp.
  5. 333 F.Supp. 484 (1971)
 

LOEB v. WHITTAKER CORPORATION

No. 71 Civ. 1766.

333 F.Supp. 484 (1971)

Ronald LOEB, Plaintiff, v. WHITTAKER CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 4, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rubin, Wachtel, Baum & Levin, New York City, for plaintiff, by Martin A. Coleman, Stephen A. Marshall, New York City, of counsel.

Hawkins, Delafield & Wood, New York City, for defendants other than Yardney Electric Corporation, by Clarence Fried, Philip R. Forlenza, New York City, of counsel.

Edward F. Rosiny, New York City, for defendant Yardney Electric Corp.

GURFEIN, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendants for an order (a) dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or declining jurisdiction, or in the alternative (b) staying the action; or (c) transferring it to the Central District of California. They also move to require a more definite complaint.

THE COMPLAINT AND THE COMPANION STATE ACTION

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases