1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 14 Cal.App.3d
  5. 14 Cal.App.3d 706 (1971)
 

CARLIN v. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS

Docket No. 9833.

14 Cal.App.3d 706 (1971)

92 Cal. Rptr. 535

MARY CARLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

January 26, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Reid, Babbage & Coil, Enos C. Reid and Donald F. Powell for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Fred R. Metheny, City Attorney, and Raymond E. Ott, Deputy City Attorney for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KERRIGAN, J.

Plaintiffs have owned and operated a small hotel in Palm Springs for many years. They have done business under the fictitious name of "6[50] Hotel"1 since 1956. In 1967 the City Council of Palm Springs adopted a comprehensive sign ordinance. One of the provisions of the ordinance prohibits, in effect, the use of an outside business sign that makes reference to prices or rates. Under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases