1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 115 N.J.
  5. 115 N.J. Super. 514 (1971)
 

LAMENDOLA v. MIZELL, ET AL.

115 N.J. Super. 514 (1971)

280 A.2d 241

ELVERA LAMENDOLA AND ALPHONSE LAMENDOLA, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS, v. LUCIUS W. MIZELL ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided July 2, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bruno L. Leopizzi argued the motion for plaintiffs (Mr. Bruno L. Leopizzi and Mr. Carmen A. Ferrante, attorneys; Mr. Donald G. Collester, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. Wood M. DeYoe argued the motion for defendant Lucius W. Mizell (Messrs. DeYoe, DeYoe & Guiney, attorneys).

Mr. Carroll A. Morley argued the motion for defendant General Motors Corporation (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys; Mr. William J. Cleary, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. Peter G. Alexis argued the motion for defendant Cerami Pontiac (Messrs. Aljian & Alexis, attorneys).

DOAN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This matter is before the court on motion of two of the defendants for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial, and on motion of the third-defendant addressed to the excessiveness of the verdict in favor of plaintiff Alphonse Lamendola.

After a five-day trial the jury returned verdicts in the amounts of $100,000 and $50,000 for plaintiffs Elvera Lamendola and her husband Alphonse, respectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases