PLATT v. HERTZ CORP.


66 Misc.2d 505 (1971)

Edward Platt, Respondent, v. Hertz Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 20, 1971


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cymrot, Wolin & Simon (Benjamin Heller of counsel), for appellant. Freeman & Smith (Ronald W. Freeman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — GOLD, J. P., QUINN and LUPIANO, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Plaintiff has failed to show that defendant Hertz gave its express or implied permission to defendant Messina to drive the truck. Defendant may validly restrict the operation of its vehicle by an unlicensed driver pursuant to the terms of its written rental agreement signed by the lessee. (Burmaster v. State of New York, 7 N.Y.2d 65, 70.)

The order should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases