1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 327 F.Supp.
  5. 327 F.Supp. 206 (1971)
 

JACK WINTER, INC. v. KORATRON COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 49,392 and other cases, Nos. 47,273; 49,558; 49,671; 49,913; 50,063; 50,827; 50,854; 51,281; 51,301; 51,650; 51,653; 51,654 and 51,691.

327 F.Supp. 206 (1971)

JACK WINTER, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. KORATRON COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Defendant. KORATRON COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Counterclaimant, v. JACK WINTER, INC., a corporation, Counterclaim defendant (and all cases consolidated for pretrial purposes).

United States District Court, N. D. California, San Francisco Division.

April 19, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foley & Lardner, by Timothy C. Frautschi, Marvin E. Klitsner, Milwaukee, Wis., Eckhoff & Hoppe, by Carl Hoppe, San Francisco, Cal., for Jack Winter, Inc.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, by Lloyd W. Dinkelspiel, Jr., M. Laurence Popofsky, Stephen V. Bomse, San Francisco, Cal., Ellis & Levy, by Willard L. Ellis, San Francisco, Cal., Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, by Paul D. Flehr, San Francisco, Cal., Limbach, Limbach & Sutton, by John P. Sutton, San Francisco, Cal., for Levi Strauss & Co.

Phelps, Hall & Keller, by Glen E. Keller, Denver, Colo., Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, by Thomas V. Heyman, Albert Robin, New York City, for Bayly Manufacturing Co.

Richards, Harris & Hubbard, by D. Carl Richards, Dallas, Tex., for Amory Garment Co. and Haggar Co.

Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, by Thomas V. Heyman, Albert Robin, New York City, Miller, Groezinger, Pettit, Evers & Martin, by Harold C. Nachtrieb, Anthony G. Wilson, San Francisco, Cal., for Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc.

King & Spalding, by Charles H. Kirbo, Charles M. Kidd, Atlanta, Ga., for Oxford Industries, Inc.

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, by Moses Lasky, Robert S. Daggett, Richard C. Wydick, San Francisco, Cal., Lyon & Lyon, by James W. Geriak, Los Angeles, Cal., for Koratron Company, Inc. and Koracorp Industries, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.

I.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PATENT PROCESS AND THE PLEETSET PROCESS

The above group of cases which have common questions of fact, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, have been transferred to the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of California for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings. The undersigned has been designated by the Panel to conduct the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases