1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 326 F.Supp.
  5. 326 F.Supp. 165 (1971)
 

PINTO v. MAREMONT CORPORATION

No. 70 Civ. 5515.

326 F.Supp. 165 (1971)

Elias M. PINTO, Nina Pinto, Maurice E. Pinto, Camila Pinto and Joseph J. Pinto, Plaintiffs, v. MAREMONT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

April 7, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for plaintiffs; Arthur L. Liman, Max Gitter, New York City, of counsel.

Sonnenschein, Levinson, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, Ill., Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for defendant; Bernard J. Nussbaum, Paul Horton, Chicago, Ill., George G. Gallantz, Michael A. Cardozo, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved for a remand of this case to the state court whence it was brought here by defendant. Both sides have the court's appreciation for skillful and learned presentations. On the less aesthetic level of result, the decision must be for plaintiffs.

The case began in the State Supreme Court, New York County, with the service of a summons alone. The complaint, served on November 17, 1970, and followed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases