1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 330 F.Supp.
  5. 330 F.Supp. 155 (1971)
 

UNITED STATES v. COUNTY NATIONAL BANK OF BENNINGTON

Civ. A. No. 6088.

330 F.Supp. 155 (1971)

UNITED STATES of America v. COUNTY NATIONAL BANK OF BENNINGTON and Catamount National Bank, Defendants, and William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency, Intervenor.

United States District Court, D. Vermont.

July 28, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. F. Cook, U. S. Atty., Rutland, Vt., Bernard Wehrman and Peter W. Oldershaw, Dept. of Justice, New York City, for plaintiff.

John H. Williams, II, Williams, Witten, Carter & Dollard, Bennington, Vt., and Eugene J. Metzger, Metzger, Schwarz, McKenna & Kempler, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

Philip L. Roache, Jr., U. S. Treasury Dept., Washington, D. C., for intervenor.

OPINION AND ORDER

LEDDY, Chief Judge.

The issue posed by defendants' and intervenor's motion for summary judgment is whether the proposed merger of the Catamount National Bank (Catamount) and the County National Bank (County National) both of Bennington County, Vermont, considered solely from an antitrust viewpoint, violates the Clayton Act standard (15 U.S.C. § 18) embodied in the Bank Merger Act of 1966. (12 U.S.C. §§ 1828(c)(5) & (7...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases