1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 57 N.J.
  5. 57 N.J. 353 (1971)
 

CRUDUP v. MARRERO

57 N.J. 353 (1971)

273 A.2d 16

THERESA CRUDUP, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM HORACE CRUDUP AND HORACE CRUDUP, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NICHOLAS MARRERO AND CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 25, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Andrew M. Rockman argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Levinson, Conover, Lieberman & Fink, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Kapsak argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Seiffert, Frisch & Gruber, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

The issue here is whether Rules 4:58-1 et seq., the Offer of Judgment rules, apply to the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq. Except for matrimonial causes, the rules were in effect on an experimental basis in all actions tried in the Law Division of the Superior and County Courts of Essex and Middlesex Counties, at the time of trial of the case which gave rise to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases