SUIT AND WELLS v. CITIZENS NAT'L BANK

[No. 21, September Term, 1971.]

263 Md. 133 (1971)

282 A.2d 109

SUIT AND WELLS EQUIPMENT CO., INC. v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 14, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Boehm for appellant.

Thomas F. Mudd, with whom were Mudd & Mudd on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.


SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case poses the question whether, under certain circumstances, the holder of a check on which payment has been stopped can require payment by the maker.1

The facts which gave rise to the controversy can be briefly told. On 3 September 1966, Suit and Wells Equipment Co., Inc. (Suit and Wells) issued a check on its account at First National Bank of Southern Maryland (First National...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases