1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 385 Mich.
  5. 385 Mich. 1 (1971)
 

HILEMAN v. INDREICA

No. 8 October Term 1970, Docket No. 52,429.

385 Mich. 1 (1971)

187 N.W.2d 411

HILEMAN v. INDREICA

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 1, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Welday, Goldstone, Boila & Ott (Michell L. Bacow, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Metry, Metry, Sanom, Ashare & Goldman (by Dennis M. Matulewicz), for defendants on appeal.

PER CURIAM:

This is an action under the dramshop act (CLS 1961, § 436.22 [Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 18.993]), brought by the surviving widow of one Hileman on behalf of herself and his minor children. The jury's verdict was no cause. Division 2 affirmed (15 Mich.App. 662). We granted leave (383 Mich. 751) to examine anew what once was well settled evidentiary trial practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases