1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 115 N.J.
  5. 115 N.J. Super. 262 (1971)
 

IN RE SEARCH OF C CO. PREMISES

115 N.J. Super. 262 (1971)

279 A.2d 130

IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PROPERTY AT PREMISES OF C COMPANY IN ROSELLE, NEW JERSEY, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PROPERTY AT PREMISES OF A IN NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PROPERTY AT PREMISES OF B COMPANY IN EAST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 18, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred K. Frigola, First Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Karl Asch, Union County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. George J. Koelzer argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys).

Mr. Warren Brody argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Winetsky, Brody and Winetsky, attorneys).

Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.

PER CURIAM.

The State, with leave of court, appeals from interlocutory orders entered by a Superior Court judge requiring the single affidavit, and any other supportive material upon which three search warrants issued, be made available to the parties claiming to be aggrieved by the search.

Our order granting leave to appeal also provided that the State refrain from calling four named individuals as witnesses before the Union County grand jury until further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases