1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 261 Md.
  5. 261 Md. 62 (1971)
 

JONES v. UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD.

[No. 237, September Term, 1970.]

261 Md. 62 (1971)

273 A.2d 418

JONES v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 10, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Guth for appellant.

David J. McDonnell, with whom were Allen, Thieblot & Alexander, Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

DIGGES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Sodaro, J.) which did not agree with John Richard Jones that he should have been allowed to bring an action against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board. Jones still contends that the unusual manner in which he was injured was a "hit and run" accident, as it is defined in the general provisions of Art. 66 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases