SPROCK v. JAMES, ET ALS.


115 N.J. Super. 111 (1971)

278 A.2d 421

MARGARET SPROCK OR BERNARD EPPS, AGENT FOR MARGARET SPROCK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FLORENCE JAMES, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 10, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard E. Blumberg argued the cause for appellants (Miss Sandra D. Helbig, Newark Legal Services Project, attorney; Miss Rita L. Murphy, Newark-Essex Joint Law Reform Project, of counsel).

Mr. Herman Chasnow argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEONARD and FRITZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, J.A.D.

The essence of appellants' argument to this court, emerging from a complicated continuum of landlord and tenant hearings in the county district court, is that the district court erred in entering a judgment for possession for nonpayment of rent without considering proffered equitable defenses, and in paying to the landlord, contemporaneously therewith, the rent in question which had been held first by defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases