1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 58 N.J.
  5. 58 N.J. 165 (1971)
 

MOTYKA ET AL. v. McCORKLE, ET AL.

58 N.J. 165 (1971)

276 A.2d 129

ALBERT MOTYKA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LLOYD McCORKLE, ETC., ET AL. DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 5, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mrs. Ann Mufson argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Peter M. Siegel, Administrator, Middlesex County Legal Services, attorney; Mr. Peter M. Siegel and Mr. Michael Parks, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Daly D.E. Temchine and Mr. Alfred L. Nardelli, Deputy Attorneys General, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The plaintiffs instituted a proceeding in the Chancery Division attacking the validity of Section 615A of the Categorical Assistance Budget Manual of the Division of Public Welfare, Department of Institutions and Agencies. The matter was transferred to the Appellate Division and we certified before argument there.

Public Welfare in New Jersey is administered through various avenues including so-called categorical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases