1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 114 N.J.
  5. 114 N.J. Super. 79 (1971)
 

BARTEL v. CLARENBACH

114 N.J. Super. 79 (1971)

274 A.2d 841

PAUL BARTEL, EXECUTOR UNDER THE WILL OF DANIEL L. CLARENBACH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF, v. ETHEL CARNATHAN CLARENBACH, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 1, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul Bartel for plaintiff.

Mr. Reginald F. Hopkinson for defendant (Messrs. Jeffer, Walter, Tierney, DeKorte, Hopkinson & Vogel, attorneys).

TRAUTWEIN, J.S.C.

There are two matters before the court. The first is an order to show cause why plaintiff should not distribute the remaining corpus of the estate of Daniel Clarenbach in accordance with plaintiff's informal accounting wherein defendant's residuary interest, which qualified for the marital deduction under 26 U.S.C.A. § 2056, was calculated after the deduction of federal taxes. The second is defendant's motion which seeks to compel

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases