IN RE PEDERSEN


486 P.2d 1283 (1971)

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of A. Whiting PEDERSEN, Accused. In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Harry G. Spencer, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 15, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Ryan, Portland, argued the cause for both accuseds. With him on the briefs for accused Pedersen were Ryan & Kennedy, Portland. Harry G. Spencer, Burns, filed briefs pro se.

William F. Schulte, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Marvin S. Nepom, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, DENECKE, TONGUE, HOWELL and BRYSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

These are disciplinary proceedings brought by the Oregon State Bar against the accuseds, A. Whiting Pedersen and Harry G. Spencer. The two proceedings were consolidated for trial before the trial committee and in the argument before this court.

The accused Spencer practices in Burns, Oregon; the accused Pedersen practices in Portland. They have associated one another on various occasions. The disciplinary action herein arose out of their joint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases