1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 342 F.Supp.
  5. 342 F.Supp. 1162 (1971)
 

ARBER v. ESSEX WIRE CORPORATION

No. C 66-814.

342 F.Supp. 1162 (1971)

Bertha ARBER et al., Plaintiffs, v. ESSEX WIRE CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

May 8, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward I. Stillman, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

H. Stephen Madsen, Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, Samuel A. Haubold, Fred H. Bartlit, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

This is a cause of action instituted under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). This statute reads as follows:

"It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange— . . . . . .

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases